CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 450 vs 410 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron M 450

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 450

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 92,100 MB/s vs 63.9 MB/s More than 1441.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.46 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 2.01 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 2.63 pt/W vs 0.92 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz vs 1.47 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,078 vs 621 Around 75% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of Intel Celeron M 410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 410

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Lower typical power consumption 21.94W vs 28.44W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 6.5 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 23.65 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 450 vs 410

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 450
92,100 MB/s
Celeron M 410
63.9 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 450  vs
410 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.46 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
M
rPGA 988A
478
LGA 775
Slot 1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 27W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 6.5 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 23.65 $/year
Performance per watt 2.63 pt/W 0.92 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 21.94W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron M 450  vs
410 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 151,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 11
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 1 - 1.3V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 2.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz 1.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 2.01 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Celeron M 450
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 410
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus