Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 450

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 2.58 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz vs 2.58 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 450 vs J1800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 450
92,100 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 450  vs
J1800 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Celeron M 450  vs
J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 10W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 2.63 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron M 450
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus