Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 450

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 460

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 460 vs the Celeron M 450.

Features Key features of the Celeron M 450  vs 460 

clock speed

Celeron M 450
2.2 GHz
Celeron 460
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 450
3.57 GHz
Celeron 460
3.57 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 450
3.12 GHz
Celeron 460
2.4 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 450  vs
460 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
LGA 775
Slot 1
M

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Celeron M 450  vs
460 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz 2.4 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,248.8 1,224.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 3.57 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W
Intel Celeron M 450
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 460
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus