CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 450 vs 240 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron M 450 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 450  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron M 450

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 450

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 92,100 MB/s vs 45,800 MB/s More than 2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,078 vs 513 More than 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better performance per watt 2.63 pt/W vs 1.81 pt/W More than 45% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD E 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 240

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 60.4 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Aug, 2008 Release date over 2 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 450 vs E 240

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
513

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 240
522

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 450
92,100 MB/s
E 240
45,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

E 240
929

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 240
321

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 450  vs
E 240 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
M
940
478
LGA 775
Slot 1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Celeron M 450  vs
E 240 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 5
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 1.18 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 500 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 500 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.63 pt/W 1.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W
Intel Celeron M 450
Report a correction
AMD E 240
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus