Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 443

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 443

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 443 vs the Celeron 560.

Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 560 vs the Celeron M 443.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 443 vs 560

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 443  vs
560 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 31W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 7.47 $/year
Performance per watt 4.29 pt/W 2.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.47W 25.19W

details

Celeron M 443  vs
560 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 151,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 16
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.1V 0.95 - 1.3V

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Celeron M 443
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus