Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 443

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 443

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 443 vs the Atom D525.

Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 443 vs Atom D525

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 443  vs
Atom D525 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 13W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 3.13 $/year
Performance per watt 4.29 pt/W 2.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.47W 10.56W

details

Celeron M 443  vs
Atom D525 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 151,000,000 176,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.1V 0.8 - 1.18V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.33 GHz 2.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.33 GHz 2.12 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron M 443
Report a correction
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus