Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron E3200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E3200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.82 GHz vs 3.57 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.2 GHz vs 3.98 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 440 vs E3200

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 440
74,050 MB/s
Celeron E3200
109,650 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 440  vs
E3200 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
LGA 775
M

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Celeron M 440  vs
E3200 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 3.82 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz 4.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 3.82 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.7 pt/W 1.8 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction
Intel Celeron E3200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus