CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 440 vs E1200 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

3.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron E1200 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron E1200  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 1.7 pt/W vs 0.78 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 3.16 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz vs 2.69 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron E1200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron E1200

Report a correction
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 73.3 °C vs 60.4 °C More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2008 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 440 vs E1200

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 440
74,050 MB/s
Celeron E1200
127.7 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 440  vs
E1200 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
LGA 775
M

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.7 pt/W 0.78 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Celeron M 440  vs
E1200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 10 8
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 0.85 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 73.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 3.16 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz 2.69 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,585.7 1,815.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 3.16 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction
Intel Celeron E1200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus