CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 440 vs 900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron 900

Intel Celeron 900

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Better performance per dollar 1.24 pt/$ vs 1.08 pt/$ More than 15% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 3.11 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 900

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,000 vs 980 Almost the same
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 88,700 MB/s vs 74,050 MB/s Around 20% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 60.4 °C Around 75% higher Maximum operating temperature
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Newer Jan, 2009 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 440 vs 900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 440
74,050 MB/s
Celeron 900
88,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 440  vs
900 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
LGA 775
M
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 1.7 pt/W 2.16 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

details

Celeron M 440  vs
900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 3.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 3.11 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus