Winner
Intel Celeron M 440
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 440 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Celeron M 440 vs 540 |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 980 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C | ![]() | Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,601 |
![]() | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,600 | ![]() | Slightly lower typical power consumption 24.38W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
4.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Celeron M 440CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 980 | vs | 802.5 | More than 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.98 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 60.4 °C | More than 65% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,601 | vs | 760 | More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 1,600 | vs | 758 | More than 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 24.38W | vs | 28.44W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Jul, 2007 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date a year later | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 7.23 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 26.28 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Celeron M 440 | vs | 540 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
M | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 30W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 7.23 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 26.28 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.7 pt/W | 1.69 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 24.38W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Celeron M 440 | vs | 540 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 105,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 14 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.34V | 0.95 - 1.3V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60.4°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.57 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.98 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Celeron M 440 ![]() | Intel Celeron 540 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | ||
T7200 vs 440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $48 | |
630 vs 440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $48 | |
N270 vs 440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | $48 | |
T5500 vs 440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $48 | |
530 vs 440 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$236 | ||
T7500 vs 540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T3400 vs 540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||