Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom E660T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E660T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 2.92W vs 28.44W 9.7x lower typical power consumption
Newer Sep, 2010 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 4 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 0.87 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 9.7x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 3.15 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 9.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron M 440  vs Atom E660T 

clock speed

Atom E660T
1.3 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 440
3.57 GHz
Atom E660T
1.3 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 440
3.98 GHz
Atom E660T
1.3 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 440  vs
Atom E660T 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 3.6W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 0.87 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 3.15 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 2.92W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 2,500 MHz

details

Celeron M 440  vs
Atom E660T 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 10 13
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 0.75 - 0.9V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 1.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated
GPU clock speed N/A 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction
Intel Atom E660T
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus