CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 430 vs 420 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 430

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 430 vs the 420.

Front view of Intel Celeron M 420

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 420

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 420 vs the 430.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 430 vs 420

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 430
74,150 MB/s
Celeron M 420
66,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 430  vs
420 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 35W 35W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 1.73 pt/W 1.57 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Celeron M 430  vs
420 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 8
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 1 - 1.34V
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 60.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz 3.38 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,406.9 1,365.1
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 430
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 420
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus