Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 430

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 68.25W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Newer Apr, 2007 vs Jun, 2005 Release date over 1 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron D 336

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 336

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C vs 60.4 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.65 GHz vs 3.43 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 3.67 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron M 430  vs D 336 

clock speed

Celeron M 430
1.8 GHz
Celeron D 336
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 430
3.43 GHz
Celeron D 336
3.65 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 430
3.67 GHz
Celeron D 336
4.32 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 430  vs
D 336 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 35W 84W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 68.25W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Celeron M 430  vs
D 336 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 125,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 21
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 67.7°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 3.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz 4.32 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,406.9 353.3
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 3.65 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Celeron M 430
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 336
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus