CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 430 vs 3200+ among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 430

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 430 vs the AMD Sempron 3200+.

Front view of AMD Sempron 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3200+

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 430 vs Sempron 3200+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 430
74,150 MB/s
Sempron 3200+
22.5 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 430  vs
Sempron 3200+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478
939
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 62W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 14.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.73 pt/W 0.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 50.38W

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 333 MHz

details

Celeron M 430  vs
Sempron 3200+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz 3 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,406.9 942.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 430
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus