Winner
Intel Celeron M 430
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 430 based on its single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details | Intel Celeron M 430 vs AMD Sempron 2800+ |
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 74,150 MB/s | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
4.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Celeron M 430CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 74,150 MB/s | vs | 43.2 MB/s | Around 1716.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 50.38W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Apr, 2007 | vs | Jul, 2004 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.67 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better performance per watt | 1.73 pt/W | vs | 0.44 pt/W | Around 4x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 60.4 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature |
summary | Celeron M 430 | vs | Sempron 2800+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
462 | |||
754 | |||
AM2 | |||
478 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 62W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.73 pt/W | 0.44 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 50.38W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 200 MHz |
details | Celeron M 430 | vs | Sempron 2800+ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 60.4°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 1 | 1 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.43 GHz | 2.36 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.67 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,406.9 | 543.6 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.43 GHz | 2.36 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Celeron M 430 ![]() | AMD Sempron 2800+ ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $37 | |
630 vs 430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
5200+ vs 430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $37 | |
E7500 vs 430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
541 vs 430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
3200+ vs 430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
E2180 vs 430 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
630 vs 2800+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||