CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 430 vs 2800+ among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron M 430 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 430  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron M 430

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 430

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 74,150 MB/s vs 43.2 MB/s Around 1716.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 50.38W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz vs 2.36 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Apr, 2007 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 2 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better performance per watt 1.73 pt/W vs 0.44 pt/W Around 4x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 14.94 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 54.31 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 2800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2800+

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 60.4 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 430 vs Sempron 2800+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 430
74,150 MB/s
Sempron 2800+
43.2 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 430  vs
Sempron 2800+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
462
754
AM2
478
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 62W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 14.94 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 54.31 $/year
Performance per watt 1.73 pt/W 0.44 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 50.38W

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 200 MHz

details

Celeron M 430  vs
Sempron 2800+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 1 1
Overclocked clock speed 3.43 GHz 2.36 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz 1.8 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,406.9 543.6
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.43 GHz 2.36 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 430
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 2800+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus