Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron M 430

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 430

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 74,150 MB/s vs 32,500 MB/s More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1 GHz 80% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 28.44W 3.9x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 60.4 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 3.24 pt/W vs 1.73 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.9x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 430 vs AMD C 50

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron M 430
74,150 MB/s
AMD C 50
32,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 430  vs
AMD C 50 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Celeron M 430  vs
AMD C 50 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 9 5
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 1.05 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6250
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 276 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 9W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.73 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 7.31W
Intel Celeron M 430
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus