Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 420

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 420

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 420 vs the AMD Turion 64 X2 56.

Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 X2 56 vs the Intel Celeron M 420.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 420 vs Turion 64 X2 56

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 420  vs
Turion 64 X2 56 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
478
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

power consumption

TDP 35W 33W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 7.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 26.81W

details

Celeron M 420  vs
Turion 64 X2 56 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 60.4°C Unknown - 95°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 420
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 56
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus