Intel Celeron M 410 vs 370 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Celeron M 410
- 1.46 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron M 410
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 370 vs the 410. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 410 vs 370
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 410 | vs | 370 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| rPGA 988A | |||
| 478 | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 27W | 21W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.5 $/year | 5.06 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.92 pt/W | 4.42 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 21.94W | 17.06W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
details | Celeron M 410 | vs | 370 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Transistor count | 151,000,000 | 144,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 11 | 15 | |
| Voltage range | 1 - 1.3V | 1 - 1.29V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.01 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.47 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.01 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 533 MHz | 400 MHz | |
 Intel Celeron M 410  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron M 370 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $32 | $116 | |
| N270 vs 370 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $116 | |
| J1900 vs 370 | ||
 | VS | |
| $21 | $116 | |
| 370M vs 370 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2 | $116 | |
| T4200 vs 370 | ||
 | VS | |
| $116 | ||
| 780 vs 370 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 725A vs 410 | ||
 | VS | |
| 550 vs 410 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
