Intel Celeron M 383 vs Atom N270 |
VS
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N270
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 383 vs the Atom N270. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Celeron M 383 vs Atom N270
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 383 | vs | Atom N270 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| 437 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 5.5W | 2.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.47W | 2.03W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 533 MHz | |
details | Celeron M 383 | vs | Atom N270 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
| Voltage range | 0.88 - 0.96V | 0.9 - 1.16V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Celeron M 383  Report a correction |  Intel Atom N270 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| N270 vs N450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $64 | |
| N270 vs N455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| N270 vs 1BGHz | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $42 | |
| N270 vs N2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | $47 | |
| N270 vs D2550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| N270 vs N550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| N270 vs G-T44R | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
