0 Comments
| Intel Celeron M 383 vs Atom N270 |
VS
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N270
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 383 vs the Atom N270. | |||||||
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed |
---|
Features Key features of the Celeron M 383 vs Atom N270
clock speed
Celeron M 383
1 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Celeron M 383
1 MB
Atom N270
0.5 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Celeron M 383
1 GHz
Atom N270
1.87 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Celeron M 383
1 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
TDP
Celeron M 383
5.5W
Atom N270
2.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 383 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 5.5W | 2.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 4.47W | 2.03W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Celeron M 383 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
Voltage range | 0.88 - 0.96V | 0.9 - 1.16V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Celeron M 383 ![]() | Intel Atom N270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
N270 vs N450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $64 | |
N270 vs N455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
N270 vs G-T44R | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
N270 vs N280 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $69 | |
N270 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $63 | |
N270 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $42 | |
N270 vs N2600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||