Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 383

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 383

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 383 vs the Atom D2550.

Front view of Intel Atom D2550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D2550

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Features Key features of the Celeron M 383  vs Atom D2550 

clock speed

Atom D2550
1.86 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Atom D2550
1.87 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Atom D2550
1.87 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 383  vs
Atom D2550 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 2.41 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.47W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron M 383  vs
Atom D2550 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.88 - 0.96V 0.91 - 1.21V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Celeron M 383
Report a correction
Intel Atom D2550
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus