Intel Celeron M 383 vs AMD A4 1200 |
VS
Released May, 2013
AMD A4 1200
- 1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD A4 1200
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
| | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 383 vs the AMD A4 1200. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Celeron M 383 vs A4 1200
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 383 | vs | A4 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1 GHz | 1 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| 462 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 5.5W | 4W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.32 $/year | 0.96 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.47W | 3.25W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 200 MHz | |
details | Celeron M 383 | vs | A4 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 28 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1 GHz | 1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1 GHz | 1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1 GHz | 1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 8180 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 225 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
 Intel Celeron M 383  Report a correction |  AMD A4 1200 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 1200 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $41 | ||
| 1200 vs Z2760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| 1200 vs Z3740 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | ||
| 1200 vs Z3735F | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1200 vs N2830 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 1200 vs 1007U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| 1200 vs N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
