Intel Celeron M 370 vs 827E |
Released January, 2005
Intel Celeron M 370
- 1.5 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron M 370
 | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Much better performance per dollar 1.09 pt/$ | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2011
Intel Celeron 827E
- 1.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 827E
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron M 370CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.09 pt/$ | vs | 0.53 pt/$ | More than 2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 916 | vs | 704 | More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,023 | vs | 613 | More than 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 4.42 pt/W | vs | 3.06 pt/W | Around 45% better performance per watt | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2011 | vs | Jan, 2005 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 370 vs 827E
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 370 | vs | 827E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| 479 | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 21W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 5.06 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 18.4 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.42 pt/W | 3.06 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 17.06W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron M 370 | vs | 827E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.25 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 15 | 14 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 800 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
 Intel Celeron M 370  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 827E Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $111 | ||
| 370 vs 725A | ||
| | VS |  |
| $111 | ||
| 370 vs 7410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $111 | $32 | |
| 370 vs N270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $111 | $378 | |
| 370 vs 3720QM | ||
| | VS |  |
| $111 | ||
| 370 vs 450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $111 | ||
| 370 vs 3000+ | ||
 | VS |  |
| $98 | $155 | |
| 827E vs N2930 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
