Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron M 370

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron M 370

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 370

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 370

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better performance per dollar 1.09 pt/$ vs 0.53 pt/$ More than 2x better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 916 vs 704 More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 2,023 vs 613 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 4.42 pt/W vs 3.06 pt/W Around 45% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Celeron 827E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 827E

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jul, 2011 vs Jan, 2005 Release date over 6 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 370 vs 827E

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 370  vs
827E 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
479
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 21W 17W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 4.42 pt/W 3.06 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron M 370  vs
827E 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 14

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz 1.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No Yes
Intel Celeron M 370
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 827E
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus