Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 360

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 360 vs the AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32.

Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32 vs the Intel Celeron M 360.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 360 vs Turion 64 technology MT-32

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 360  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-32 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Celeron M 360  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-32 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.83 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.83 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 21W 24W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 5.78 $/year
Performance per watt 1.45 pt/W 1.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 19.5W
Intel Celeron M 360
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-32
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus