CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 360 vs 1800 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

2.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron M 360 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 360  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 360

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 360 vs the AMD E2 1800.

Front view of AMD E2 1800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 1800

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 360 vs E2 1800

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 360  vs
E2 1800 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 21W 18W
Annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 1.45 pt/W 2.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 17.06W 14.63W

details

Celeron M 360  vs
E2 1800 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 14 5
Voltage range 1 - 1.29V 0.88 - 1.35V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.83 GHz 1.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.83 GHz 1.72 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7340
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 523 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 680 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Celeron M 360
Report a correction
AMD E2 1800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus