0 Comments
| Intel Celeron M 353 vs Atom N270 |
VS
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N270
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 353 vs the Atom N270. | |||||||
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed |
---|
Features Key features of the Celeron M 353 vs Atom N270
clock speed
Celeron M 353
0.9 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Celeron M 353
0.5 MB
Atom N270
0.5 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Celeron M 353
1.08 GHz
Atom N270
1.87 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Celeron M 353
0.9 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
TDP
Atom N270
2.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 353 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 5W | 2.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.2 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 4.06W | 2.03W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Celeron M 353 | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 47,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.08 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 0.9 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.08 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Celeron M 353 ![]() | Intel Atom N270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N450 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N455 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $32 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Atom N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $32 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
Intel Atom N280 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $32 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||