Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 353

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 353

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 353 vs the AMD Sempron 200U.

Front view of AMD Sempron 200U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 200U

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Features Key features of the Celeron M 353  vs Sempron 200U 

clock speed

Celeron M 353
0.9 GHz
Sempron 200U
1 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron M 353
0.5 MB
Sempron 200U
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 353
1.08 GHz
Sempron 200U
1 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 353
0.9 GHz
Sempron 200U
1 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 353  vs
Sempron 200U 
Clock speed 0.9 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 5W 8W
Annual home energy cost 1.2 $/year 1.93 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.06W 6.5W

details

Celeron M 353  vs
Sempron 200U 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.08 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.9 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.08 GHz 1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 353
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 200U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus