Intel Celeron M 330 vs Atom N270

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Intel Celeron M 330

Intel Atom N270

Join the discussion

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 330

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 330 vs the Atom N270.

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction

Much newer manufacturing process

45 nm

130 nm

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Supports dynamic frequency scaling

Yes

Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Has a NX bit

Yes

Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Higher clock speed

1.6 GHz

1.4 GHz

Around 15% higher clock speed

Lower typical power consumption

2.03W

19.91W

9.8x lower typical power consumption

Newer

Jun, 2008

Jun, 2004

Release date over 4 years later

Lower annual home energy cost

0.6 $/year

5.9 $/year

9.8x lower annual home energy cost

Lower annual commercial energy cost

2.19 $/year

21.46 $/year

9.8x lower annual commercial energy cost

Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water)

1.6 GHz

1.4 GHz

Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

clock speed

Celeron M 330

1.4 GHz

Atom N270

1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron M 330

0.5 MB

Atom N270

0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 330

1.9 GHz

Atom N270

1.87 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 330

1.4 GHz

Atom N270

1.6 GHz

TDP

Celeron M 330

24.5W

Atom N270

2.5W

summary	Celeron M 330	Atom N270
Clock speed	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz
Cores	Single core	Single core
Socket type
478
479
437
features
Has a NX bit	No	Yes
Supports trusted computing	No	No
Has virtualization support	No	No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	No	Yes
power consumption
TDP	24.5W	2.5W
Annual home energy cost	5.9 $/year	0.6 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	21.46 $/year	2.19 $/year
Typical power consumption	19.91W	2.03W

details	Celeron M 330	Atom N270
Architecture	x86	x86
Threads	1	2
L2 cache	0.5 MB	0.5 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core	0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	130 nm	45 nm
Transistor count	77,000,000	47,000,000
Max CPUs	1	1
Clock multiplier	14	12
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	1.9 GHz	1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	1.9 GHz	1.87 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	None	None
Label	N/A	N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A	N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A	N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A	N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A	N/A
3DMark06	N/A	N/A
bus
Architecture	FSB	FSB
Number of links	1	1
Clock speed	400 MHz	533 MHz

Intel Celeron M 330

Report a correction

Intel Atom N270

Report a correction

	Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm		Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes
	Has a NX bit Yes		Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz

	VS
$32		$64
N270 vs N450

	VS
$32		$64
N270 vs N455

	VS
$32		$69
N270 vs 630

	VS
$32		$42
N270 vs N2600

	VS
$32		$63
N270 vs D525

	VS
$32
N270 vs N280

	VS
$32		$17
N270 vs Z3735F

	VS
$305		$300
W3520 vs 2500

	VS
$272		$350
4790K vs 6700K

	VS
$281
4200U vs 6410

	VS
$281
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410

	VS
$275		$161
4005U vs N3540

	VS
$248		$230
4770K vs 9590

	VS
$250		$350
6600K vs 6700K

Intel Celeron M 330 vs Atom N270