Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 318

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 318

Report a correction
Slightly lower typical power consumption 5.69W vs 8.13W 30% lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year vs 8.76 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year vs 2.41 $/year 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Apr, 2004 Release date over 9 years later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron M 318  vs J1900 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 318  vs
J1900 
Clock speed 0.9 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

power consumption

TDP 7W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year 8.76 $/year
Typical power consumption 5.69W 8.13W

details

Celeron M 318  vs
J1900 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.9 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.9 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.9 GHz 2.42 GHz
Intel Celeron M 318
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus