Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 318

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 318

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 318 vs the Celeron 1007U.

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Features Key features of the Celeron M 318  vs 1007U 

clock speed

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 318  vs
1007U 
Clock speed 0.9 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron M 318  vs
1007U 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.9 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.9 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.9 GHz 1.5 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7W 17W
Annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year 4.1 $/year
Typical power consumption 5.69W 13.81W
Intel Celeron M 318
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus