Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 318

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 318

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 318 vs the Atom N270.

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Features Key features of the Celeron M 318  vs Atom N270 

clock speed

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron M 318
0.5 MB
Atom N270
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Atom N270
1.87 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 318  vs
Atom N270 
Clock speed 0.9 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
437

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron M 318  vs
Atom N270 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 0.9 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 0.9 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 0.9 GHz 1.87 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7W 2.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year 0.6 $/year
Typical power consumption 5.69W 2.03W
Intel Celeron M 318
Report a correction
Intel Atom N270
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus