Intel Celeron M 215 vs 220 |
VS
Released October, 2007
Intel Celeron 220
- 1.2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 220
 | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 215 vs the Celeron 220. | |||||||
| |||||||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 215 vs 220
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 215 | vs | 220 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 27W | 19W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.5 $/year | 4.58 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 23.65 $/year | 16.64 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.26 pt/W | 1.24 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 21.94W | 15.44W | |
details | Celeron M 215 | vs | 220 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.48 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.73 GHz | 1.48 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz | |
 Intel Celeron M 215  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 220 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| 220 vs N270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $29 | ||
| 220 vs 230 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $43 | ||
| 220 vs 330 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 220 vs 330 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| 220 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | ||
| 220 vs N2800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | ||
| 220 vs 2020M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
