0 Comments
| Intel Celeron M 215 vs 220 |
VS
Released October, 2007
Intel Celeron 220
- 1.2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 220
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 215 vs the Celeron 220. | |||||||
| |||||||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor |
---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 215 vs 220
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron M 215
991
Celeron 220
962
GeekBench
Celeron M 215
991
Celeron 220
962
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron M 215
322
Celeron 220
320
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron M 215
487
Celeron 220
392
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 215 | vs | 220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 27W | 19W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.5 $/year | 4.58 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 23.65 $/year | 16.64 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.26 pt/W | 1.24 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 21.94W | 15.44W |
details | Celeron M 215 | vs | 220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.48 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.73 GHz | 1.48 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
Intel Celeron M 215 ![]() | Intel Celeron 220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
220 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$43 | ||
220 vs 330 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
220 vs 310 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
220 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | ||
220 vs 230 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | ||
220 vs 820 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
220 vs 330 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||