Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom D525

Intel Atom D525

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 215

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 215

Report a correction
Better PassMark (Single core) score 487 vs 284 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Lower typical power consumption 10.56W vs 21.94W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.12 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per watt 2.62 pt/W vs 1.26 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year vs 6.5 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 11.39 $/year vs 23.65 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 215 vs Atom D525

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 215  vs
Atom D525 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 27W 13W
Annual home energy cost 6.5 $/year 3.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 23.65 $/year 11.39 $/year
Performance per watt 1.26 pt/W 2.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 21.94W 10.56W

details

Celeron M 215  vs
Atom D525 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.73 GHz 2.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.33 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.73 GHz 2.12 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron M 215
Report a correction
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus