Intel Celeron M 215 vs Atom D2550 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Celeron M 215
- 1.33 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron M 215
 | Better PassMark (Single core) score 487 |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Atom D2550
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom D2550
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Atom D2550CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 487 | vs | 302 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1.86 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 21.94W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.59 pt/W | vs | 1.26 pt/W | More than 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 6.5 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 23.65 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 215 vs Atom D2550
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 215 | vs | Atom D2550 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 27W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 6.5 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 23.65 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.26 pt/W | 3.59 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 21.94W | 8.13W | |
details | Celeron M 215 | vs | Atom D2550 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.73 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Integrated | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 640 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron M 215  Report a correction |  Intel Atom D2550 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $63 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron 1037U vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $47 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | ||
| AMD G G-T48E vs Intel Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom D2550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
