0 Comments
| Intel Celeron M 215 vs Atom 230 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Celeron M 215
- 1.33 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron M 215
![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 487 |
VS
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom 230
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom 230
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 3.25W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Atom 230CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 487 | vs | 241 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 3.25W | vs | 21.94W | 6.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better performance per watt | 6.22 pt/W | vs | 1.26 pt/W | Around 5x better performance per watt | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 0.96 $/year | vs | 6.5 $/year | 6.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 3.5 $/year | vs | 23.65 $/year | 6.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 215 vs Atom 230
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron M 215
991
Atom 230
501
GeekBench
Celeron M 215
991
Atom 230
1,064
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron M 215
322
Atom 230
308
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron M 215
487
Atom 230
241
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 215 | vs | Atom 230 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 27W | 4W | |
Annual home energy cost | 6.5 $/year | 0.96 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 23.65 $/year | 3.5 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.26 pt/W | 6.22 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 21.94W | 3.25W |
details | Celeron M 215 | vs | Atom 230 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 12 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.89 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.33 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.73 GHz | 1.89 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
Intel Celeron M 215 ![]() | Intel Atom 230 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $43 | |
Intel Atom 230 vs 330 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | ||
Intel Atom 230 vs AMD Sempron 200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $63 | |
Intel Atom 230 vs D525 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $32 | |
Intel Atom 230 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $179 | |
Intel Atom 230 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | ||
Intel Atom 230 vs AMD Geode NX 1500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$29 | $69 | |
Intel Atom 230 vs Pentium 4 630 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||