0 Comments
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | Better turbo clock speed 854 MHz |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the J1800
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | ![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 1.15 mPixels/s |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron J1900CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 56,900 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 939x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | vs | 792 MHz | Around 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 1.15 mPixels/s | vs | 0.39 mPixels/s | Around 3x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs J1800
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron J1900
36.45 fps
Celeron J1800
-1 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
2,927
Celeron J1800
1,661
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
924
Celeron J1800
964
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Celeron J1900
6,342
Celeron J1800
3,605
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron J1900
1,863
Celeron J1800
1,028
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron J1900
534
Celeron J1800
554
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | J1800 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | 792 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | J1800 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | 3.97 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() | Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
3220 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $82 | |
N3150 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $82 | |
J2900 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1037U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J3455 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1007U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
3220 vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
PotatoPower (10:55 AM, February 22, 2016)