Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
 | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | More cores 4 | | Better turbo clock speed 854 MHz |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the J1800
| | Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 1.15 mPixels/s |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron J1900CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 56,900 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 939x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | vs | 792 MHz | Around 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 1.15 mPixels/s | vs | 0.39 mPixels/s | Around 3x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs J1800
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | J1800 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 688 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | 792 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | J1800 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | 3.97 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron J1900  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron J1800 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $82 | |
| 3220 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $82 | |
| N3150 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $82 | |
| J2900 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $82 | |
| 1037U vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | ||
| J3455 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $82 | |
| 1007U vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $72 | |
| 3220 vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
