CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs J1800 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 60.6 MB/s Around 939x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better turbo clock speed 854 MHz vs 792 MHz Around 10% better turbo clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 1.15 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s Around 3x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs J1800

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
36.45 fps
Celeron J1800
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
J1800 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.41 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.58 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
tough choice to be honest.
comments powered by Disqus