Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,482 Around 95% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 2.38 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 5% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Dec, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G460

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 85,000 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 50% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per dollar 2.25 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 4.2x better performance per dollar
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs G460

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron G460
85,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
G460 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
G460 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.9 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 2.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G460
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus