Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 3.45 pt/W Around 25% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron G1820TE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1820TE

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 2.87 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 5.5x better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,295 vs 534 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Oct, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs G1820TE

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
G1820TE 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD (Haswell)
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
G1820TE 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 3.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1820TE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus