CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs G1820 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron G1820 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron G1820  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 43.88W 5.4x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 2.59 pt/W Around 65% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 13.01 $/year 5.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 47.3 $/year 5.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1820

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1820

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 10.03 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s More than 25.5x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.8 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 5.2x better performance per dollar
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 854 MHz Around 25% better turbo clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,581 vs 534 Around 3x better PassMark (Single core) score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,914 vs 2,927 Around 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.79 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.73 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Oct, 2013 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs G1820

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
Celeron G1820
7.87 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
Celeron G1820
10.03 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
Celeron G1820
0.61 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron G1820
154,300 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
G1820 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD (Haswell)
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
G1820 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.79 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 54W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 13.01 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 47.3 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 2.59 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 43.88W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1820
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus