CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs G1620 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron G1620  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 44.69W 5.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 1.99 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 5% higher GPU clock speed
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 5.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 8 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron G1620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1620

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 2.6 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 5x better performance per dollar
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 854 MHz Around 25% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,445 vs 534 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 3.79 mHash/s vs 1.78 mHash/s Around 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,618 vs 2,927 Around 25% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.79 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs G1620

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
Celeron G1620
3.79 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
36.45 fps
Celeron G1620
74.24 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
Celeron G1620
0.36 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron G1620
140,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
G1620 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
G1620 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.79 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 55W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 1.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 44.69W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1620
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus