Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Intel Celeron G1610T

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 5% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 8 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610T

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 3.08 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 6x better performance per dollar
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 854 MHz Around 25% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,710 vs 924 More than 85% better geekbench 3 single core score
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs G1610T

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron G1610T
119,750 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
G1610T 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
G1610T 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2.44 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 3.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus