CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs 847 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900  based on its performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,405 More than 2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 54,500 MB/s Around 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better turbo clock speed 854 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 5% better turbo clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 13.81W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.41 pt/$ More than 25% better performance per dollar
Better performance per watt 4.27 pt/W vs 3.23 pt/W More than 30% better performance per watt
Slightly better PassMark score 1,863 vs 938 Around 2x better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 4.1 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 14.89 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.09 fps vs -1 fps More than 100% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs 847

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
Celeron 847
0.09 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
847 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 800 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,384 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
847 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.1 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 17W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 3.23 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus