Intel Celeron J1900 vs 1037U |
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron J1900
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
| | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | | More cores 4 |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1037U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 1037U
| | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.01 mPixels/s | | Much better performance per dollar 1.14 pt/$ |
| | Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz | | More number of displays supported 3 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Celeron 1037UCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 95% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 13.81W | More than 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2013 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 4.1 $/year | More than 40% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 14.89 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.01 mPixels/s | vs | 0.39 mPixels/s | Around 10.2x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.14 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | Around 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 854 MHz | More than 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,468 | vs | 924 | Around 60% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 5.02 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | More than 15% better performance per watt | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs 1037U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | 1037U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | 1037U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | 5.02 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron J1900  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1037U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $125 | |
| J1900 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $107 | |
| J1900 vs N3150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $72 | |
| J1900 vs J1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $94 | |
| J1900 vs J2900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| J1900 vs J3455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| J1900 vs 1007U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| J1900 vs J3160 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
