CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs 1017U among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 1017U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 1017U  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Intel Celeron 1017U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 95% higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 3 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1017U

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 84,150 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s Around 50% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 77.07 fps vs 36.45 fps More than 2x better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs 1017U

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
Celeron 1017U
3.69 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
36.45 fps
Celeron 1017U
77.07 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
Celeron 1017U
0.38 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Celeron 1017U
84,150 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
1017U 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
1017U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 17W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 4.32 pt/W 4.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1017U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus