Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of Intel Atom Z3570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3570

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3570 vs the Celeron J1900.

Features Key features of the Celeron J1900  vs Atom Z3570 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz
Atom Z3570
2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz
Atom Z3570
2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom Z3570 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 688 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom Z3570 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Architecture x86-64 x86-64

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 2 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 8.13W N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3570
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus