Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 29,200 MB/s Around 95% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,037 More than 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 640 MHz Around 10% higher GPU clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 619 More than 3x better PassMark score
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Dec, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom N2800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N2800

Report a correction
Better performance per dollar 0.73 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 40% better performance per dollar
Better performance per watt 5.28 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 25% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom N2800

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom N2800
29,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom N2800 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,997.12 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom N2800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 6.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 1.57 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 5.69 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 5.28 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 5.28W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom N2800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus