CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs N270 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron J1900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 24,800 MB/s More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 491 Around 6x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jun, 2008 Release date over 5 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 271 More than 6.8x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 9.71 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Better performance per dollar 0.76 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ More than 45% better performance per dollar
Lower typical power consumption 2.03W vs 8.13W 4x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 2.19 $/year vs 8.76 $/year 4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 0.6 $/year vs 2.41 $/year 4x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom N270

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom N270
24,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom N270 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 688 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom N270 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.87 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 2.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 0.6 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 2.19 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 9.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 2.03W
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom N270
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus