CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J1900 vs E3845 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Atom E3845
n.d.
J3455
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Atom E3845
n.d.
J3455
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom E3845 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom E3845  based on its value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 542 MHz More than 25% higher GPU clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 854 MHz vs 792 MHz Around 10% better turbo clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.92 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.91 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 317,450 MB/s vs 56,900 MB/s More than 5.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per dollar 2.19 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 4.2x better performance per dollar
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 1.12 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s More than 2.8x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Much better performance per watt 11.4 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 2.8x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom E3845

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s
Atom E3845
1.83 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s
Atom E3845
1.12 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron J1900
-1 fps
Atom E3845
0.13 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom E3845
317,450 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom E3845 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.91 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 542 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom E3845 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.92 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.91 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.92 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 11.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus