Winner
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron J1900 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom E3827 |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
![]() | Significantly better performance per dollar 0.88 pt/$ |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.75 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 542 MHz | More than 25% higher GPU clock speed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | vs | 792 MHz | Around 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.75 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 1,863 | vs | 849 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 534 | vs | 398 | Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.75 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly better performance per dollar | 0.88 pt/$ | vs | 0.52 pt/$ | Around 70% better performance per dollar |
summary | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom E3827 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | HD | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 542 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | 792 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Celeron J1900 | vs | Atom E3827 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 8W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 7.01 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.27 pt/W | 4.49 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 6.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() | Intel Atom E3827 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $125 | |
J1900 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
J1900 vs N3150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $94 | |
J1900 vs J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
J1900 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J1900 vs J3455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
J1900 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||