Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron J1900

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 197.9 MB/s More than 287.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 533 MHz Around 30% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 1,863 vs 564 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom E3825

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3825

Report a correction
Better performance per dollar 0.75 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 45% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron J1900 vs Atom E3825

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
Atom E3825
197.9 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom E3825 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 533 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1066
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom E3825 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.33 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 6W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 4.27 pt/W 4.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 4.88W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3825
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus