Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of Intel Atom E3805

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3805

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom E3805 vs the Celeron J1900.

Features Key features of the Celeron J1900  vs Atom E3805 

clock speed

Atom E3805
1.33 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz
Atom E3805
1.33 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron J1900
2.42 GHz
Atom E3805
1.33 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom E3805 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 688 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron J1900  vs
Atom E3805 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Architecture x86-64 x86-64

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.42 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz 1.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz 1.33 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 3W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 2.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3805
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus